 |
|
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
|
|
 |
Panadura Magistrate Court issued a conditional order against the Royal Marketing, a plastic manufacturing company located in SarikkaMulla, Panadura on 18th November 2009. |
 |
A public nuisance case was filed against a service station in Bandaragama seeking control air pollution. |
|
Appeal Court case on illegal river bed mining in the Kahangama area in Kaluganga August 2009 |
|
|
Against sand mining in Atthanagalu Oya in Minuwangoda - July 2009 ... |
|
|
regading a piggery in Kandana - March 2009 ... |
|
|
|
|
regarding election posters during the Western provincial Elections - December 2008 ...
|
|
|
CEJ provide legal aid for people affected by Cyanide pollution of drinking water in Minuangoda - 2008 ...
|
|
|
Case seeking a Solid waste management Policy - June 2007 ...
|
|
|
|
Case seeking an Elephant Conservation Policy- May 2007 ...
|
|
|
|
Case against Nuraichcholai Coal Power Plant- July 2006 ...
|
|
|
|
Challenging the constitutionality of the North Western Provincial Environmental Statute- July 2006 ...
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
Sethusamudram Sea Canal |
|
| |
|
The Sethusamudram Ship Canal Project under the consideration of the Ministry of Shipping, Government of India, envisages creation of a ship canal to suit different drafts (9.15 m, 10.7 m and 12.8m) through dredging/excavation in Adams Bridge and parts of Palk Bay. |
|
| |
The navigation route will originate from the Tuticorin new harbour in the Gulf of Mannar (GOM) using available navigation depths (> 20 m) up to south east of Pamban Island, pass through a canal created in Adams Bridge within the international boundary and proceed parallel to the International Medial Line for fishing rights as the Bengal channel. Availability of depths in middle channel in Palk Bay area, capital dredging across Adams Bridge and in Palk Strait and continuous maintenance of dredging along the proposed transit are the critical project related issues. Read more
The project was under heavy criticism by environmentalist of India and Sri Lanka. However, India decided to continue with the project. |
|
| |
Read more |
|
| |
CEJ letter to United Nations Environment Programme |
|
| |
UNEP Response |
|
| |
Summery Environmental Impact Assessment |
|
|
 |
|
 |
